Today, U.S. News & World Report elevated FIU to No. 72 in the nation among public universities. The annual ranking is considered the gold standard and one that FIU has climbed steadily, and quickly, since first landing on the list in the 1980s. FIU is the fastest-rising in U.S. public university rankings, having jumped 62 spots in the past 10 years.
On top of that accomplishment, FIU has made headlines for its high placement on two other lists – alongside institutions such as Princeton, Stanford and MIT – that observers increasingly call “the rankings that matter.” They take into account not only high levels of research but also an institution’s capacity to advance individuals’ socioeconomic status, or “social mobility,” through education and opportunities.
“FIU continues to reach new heights in both academic and research excellence,” says FIU Interim President Kenneth A. Jessell. “With every success, we renew our commitment to our faculty, staff, students and community.”
Forbes magazine recently wrote about the ranking compiled by Degree Choices, which uses government data to calculate the economic return on graduates’ investment in their college education. FIU took the No. 23 spot among all U.S. universities for the short time graduates need – just 13 months – to recoup their financial investment. The ranking considers tuition affordability, low student debt and individuals’ ability to secure good-paying jobs after earning degrees. The good news for FIU comes at a time when college-loan repayment has been identified nationally as an increasing burden on many Americans.
Washington Monthly’s latest college guide places FIU No. 32 nationally in its annual ranking, which examines institutions’ contributions to the public good in three broad categories: social mobility, research and opportunities for public service. In releasing the rankings, Washington Monthly’s Kevin Carey wrote, “America needs a different definition of higher education excellence. . . . that measures what colleges do for their country, instead of for themselves.”
Carey explained that the publication looks not at endowments but instead “measures how often students give to their communities by volunteering, starting public service careers and enrolling in the Peace Corps and ROTC.” He also decried prestigious institutions’ limiting admissions to “rich valedictorians” and extolls instead helping students of limited economic means “start their lives and careers with a high-quality degree.”